Sunday, February 11, 2007

Rabbi Natan (formerly Nosson) Slifkin

This is going to be a pretty short post as this subject has been discussed on numerous blogs many times. I just wanted to put in my two cents (please forgive the cliche).

My wife and I just purchased two of Rabbi Slifkin's seforim, Mysterious Creatures, which discusses mythological creatures from a Torah standpoint, and his latest, a revamp of a previous sefer, The Challenge of Creation.

Neither my wife nor I really understand how people who are considered Gedolei Yisroel (though by what criteria, I'm not quite sure) can put a person and his materials in cherem when though don't even really know what the material they are banning really discusses, while other roshei yeshiva give hascamas to their students' books that are basically Nazism - discussing the superiority of the Jewish people, saying how all others are sub-human and not worthy to walk the earth - without even reading those books. This was the case of a book a student from Lakewood Yeshiva wrote. His Rosh Yeshiva gave it a hascama, which he did retract when he was actually told what the book said. However, shouldn't that rosh yeshiva, a man considered a gadol b'Yisroel, have read, or at least skimmed the book, before giving it a hascama? And yet as as gadol, according the chareidi/Yeshivish world, he is infallible, as all gedolim are, apparently. So how did he make this mistake?

Answer: Gedolim are indeed fallible, be they modern day rabbis or Chazal, or the Nevi'im, or even Moshe Rabbeinu himself. Yes, Moseh Rabbeinu was fallible and even made mistakes. God told him to speak the rock, and Moshe hit it. I don't care how the meforshim try to dress up his actions to make it seem like he did not goof. He did, and for that goof, Moshe did not get to go into Eretz Yisroel. Period.

And there are so many stories like that in Tanach. Adam Harishon? He goofed. He knew full well what he was being fed. Or how about the story of Yehuda and Tamar. I don't care how the Meforshim like to dress up Yehuda's actions. At the end of the day, he saw a prostitute on the road and decided to sleep with her. And when the time came, he didn't say "I couldn't have possibly made a mistake." He said: "Tsodka Memeni." "She was right and I was wrong." Dovid Hamelech owned up to his mistakes, and he was punished for them. Chizkiyahu Hamelech decided not to have children because he saw in Ruach Hakodesh what Menashe would do. He was punished and continued to be punished until he changed his mind.

The stories go on and on. Nobody is infallible. A man cannot live a lifetime and not sin. These apologetics that exonerate people because we can't imagine them goofing up must stop.

Back to Rabbi Slifkin. He was put into cherem because some people decided to take words and sentences out of context and use them as proof that he was being a heretic. It's disgusting, and the fact that modern day "gedolim" allow themselves to be controlled by their "handlers," their Meshamshiim who restrict access to these "gedolim," who should be accessible to all, is in itself a fallacy they must rectify if there is ever to be a healing in the ever growing rift in Klal Yisroel.

7 comments:

Rafi G. said...

I agree, but it is a troubling issue to contemplate, at least for someone coming out of the yeshiva world. I just wrote on one of my blogs yesterday about the possibility that Moshe used selfish concerns when he sent Yisro back home after Yisro telling him what to do.

I just sat last night with RNS at a sheva brachos and it is really a shame how he has been taken out of context and brandied about as a heretic. people do not even know what the problem is. Some think some of what he said is wrong and heresy. some think it was his attitude. Others think other things. It is all made up.

Esther said...

When I read Mysterious Creatures, I was amazed by how completely respectful Rav Slifkin was towards Chazal and the traditional view. For those who have not read this book, he basically goes throguh various creatures mentioned by Chazal that are mythological. Instead of just saying, they were wrong, he does everything possible to show respect to their view. So in one case he concludes that we misunderstand what specific animal they were referring to, in another he says that they knew that they were using a metaphor, and so on. No bashing, extremely respectful...

Rafi, that is amazing that you got to sit with him. I wish I had gone on the zoo tour years ago in Los Angeles, I doubt he will ever make his way to Cleveland.

Esther said...

Take a look at this post by Rabbi Student. http://hirhurim.blogspot.com/2007/02/suffering-from-success.html
I think this relates to many of the points you have discussing on your blog.

Anonymous said...

did he change the way his name is pronounced from Nosson to Natan? Or are you just being all "anti yeshivish" by giving him a less Ashkenazic name? Reminds me of a certain friend of yours calling your son Daviiiiid instead of Dovid. If he IS Natan then fine... but if he's Nosson, let's call him Nosson. :)

Esther said...

To the New Mommy (yay!): No, he actually has changed the spelling of his name. If you need to see proof, look up his latest book "Challenge of Creation" on Amazon.com and you will see.

Anonymous said...

no need for proof-- I totally trust you guys! :) thanks!

Orthonomics said...

Apologies in advance if my son calls your son Daviiiid this summer when we (or you) come visiting. He knows Dovids too, but we think he might believe they are girls with the long hair. :)

Sorry I have nothing to add that hasn't been said before.